Home » Car Launch

Renault Reveal the R30

By Mav | 31 Jan 2010 | 8 Comments | 2,272 views

A new look and a new driver for Renault as the team unveiled a new livery as well as confirming the signing of Vitaly Petrov to race alongside Robert Kubica in 2010. One thing is for sure in 2010, Renault will have one of the most striking cars on the grid with a wasp-like yellow and black livery harking back to the car manufacturer’s first foray into Formula 1 in 1978.

But is it the the R30 though? Once you look past the livery it looks remarkably like the R29 – even the wheelbase doesn’t seem that different.

“It’s very different and even my Mum could tell the exterior differences! The R30 is a considerably more svelte and attractive car than its predecessor. These changes are not made for aesthetic appeal however; they are the result of the intensive aerodynamic development that the R30 has benefited from.”
James Allison, Technical Director

Well with James Allison’s mother unavailable for comment, there was nothing for it but to play spot the difference. There are obviously similarities with the nose again sporting the distinctive skirts under the nose that were such a feature of last year’s car. The sidepods also give away Renault’s heritage with the team’s distinctive inlet shape retained, yet there are subtle differences in the sidepod layout, most notably that the exhausts exit lower and further back. There also appears to be significant changes to the rear crash structure – not the sort of changes you simply make for a livery launch. A pertinent question would be “why did they hide the diffuser if it is the R29?”

However, when you sit the R30 and R29 side-by-side, the more subtle changes become apparent, take for instance the nose that on the face of it hasn’t changed. Looking more closely (figure 6 below, not scaled) the nose is clearly narrower, necessitating uprights that need to arch out from the nose in order to fit the standard central wing section that all the teams need to use.

But it’s on an overhead comparison that things become more interesting (figure 5 below). In this case, I have scaled the cars to match based on a number of dimensions that should be identical across both the 2009 and 2010 cars. The “R30″ appears to be slightly longer, suggesting it is indeed a different chassis. However, what is more intriguing is how the driver cockpits line-up. It appears that Renault have found the space for a larger fuel tank by relying almost entirely on moving the drivers forward (and despite having one of the tallest drivers on the grid!) Is that because the R29 was particularly long in the first place having been designed around KERS? On the face of it that is a clever move and the shortwheel base should be advantageous on several circuits, although if the released dimensions of the car length are to be believed it is still a longer car than the Sauber C29.

The off-set of that is that the sidepods appear bulkier than their rivals who have launched so far. Their priority has been in maximising the aerodynamics around the double-deck diffuser, Renault have gone for handling and possibly a higher drag design with it. Have Renault also had to compromise with a taller fuel tank than others, raising the centre of gravity? Which route works out best remains to be seen but it makes you wonder what Red Bull will achieve around the Renault engine.

Still, the R30 looks heavily underdeveloped from last year’s car, a car that was quickly being left behind by the opposition. The nose in particular was picked-out by Renault themselves as being a weak-point of the design and yet on these initial images, appears to have been retained to some extent. For sure, if Red Bull and Brawn are the trend setters for 2010, Renault are off doing their own thing.
.

tntntn
tntntn

.

Click thumbnails for large images | images courtesy of Renault F1 Team

Tagged: , , ,
Bookmark and Share

8 Comments »

  • Aerodynbamics

    Wow, I really hope Renault come up with something special in the upcoming season, I will always have a soft spot for them regardless of Alonso’s departure to Ferrari

      (Quote)  (Reply)

    .
  • Spenny

    “After I buy the team I’ve got €500,000 in the bank. Can you give me a 2010 spec for that?”

    “Well, yes and no, but me mum has some good ideas, I’m sure we can come up with something. And yes, we did keep the compromising photos safe, so Robert is ‘happy’ to stay.”

      (Quote)  (Reply)

    .
  • Adie

    Makes the Macca look even more aggressive…

    I know they (Renault) have money problems, but considering the similarities with the R29 if this *IS* the R30 then they’ve got a looooooooooooong season ahead of them.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

    .
  • uberVU - social comments
    .
  • jolly

    looking at image 5
    If R29 was supposed to have overall length 4,800 mm and R30 is supposed to have an overall length of 5,050 mm, then distance in the photo between the two cars length should be 25 cm, but it doesn’t look to be.

      (Quote)  (Reply)

    .
  • Maverick (author)

    jolly: If R29 was supposed to have overall length 4,800 mm and R30 is supposed to have an overall length of 5,050 mm…

    The key word being “supposed” – the teams are never that honest about these things and it would depend on what is fitted anyway, a longer nose, a rear wing with greater overhang for example.

    But I’m not sure I believe that figure of 5,050 mm

      (Quote)  (Reply)

    .

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.